I cannot believe you are so naive as to think that the profile created shortly after you ousted Wanderers82 which seems so similar in tone right down to the same of/have error is anything other that the same person, so I conclude that you are turning a blind eye because you know that upholding freedom of speech comes at the cost of permitting imbeciles to speak but that it a far cheaper price to pay than the alternative which is the silencing of critical discourse by those who would put themselves and their causes above criticism.
I am greatly offended that i am being accused of being someone else , if if had any idea that this was the way that you treated new members of this forum I would not of joined , the person you are accusing me of being must of been rude/nasty for people to react this way , as I said previously I thought this was a forum where people could give their opinions freely and not a forum where everyone has to agree with everyone, if that was the case that would make for a boring forum , differene of options is what makes forums Interesting.
is there a way I can check Wanderers82 profile to see exactly why you are accusing me of bring him and to understand why some people are so adverse to him?
Ffs... everyone give it a rest, and give people a chance ! It's no wonder it ends up being the same 20 or 30 people posting and no one else ever bothers
Having been a mod on other forums you can spend an inordinate amount of your freetime dealing with fuckwits for no reward that sometimes it becomes the only course of action. And it can become a thankless task balancing what’s right for the majority
also, fun fact , I blocked wanderers82 but everytime one of you lot quoted him it still somehow floated back into view. Thanks for that.
Eight thumbs up are forgivable provided we are all agreed that @Wanderers82 and @Quartersman80 are one and the same person (albeit he/she may have been getting a bit of help in composing recent posts). I too agree with @Ed_ ’s suggestion that, in the interests of free speech, the person formerly known as Wanderers82 should be allowed to continue to post under his/her new username.
It feels snobby to mock someone based on their literacy. This forum is for football opinions - stop grading posts like it's an A-level English Language exam.
I'm not calling out anyone in particular! In the last two or three pages of posts you can observe a minimum of three different users either directly or indirectly mocking grammar/spelling/linguistic approach.
Apparently not. I came here just now to see if there was confirmation of the rumour that a goalkeeper had been signed. Nothing on the official website either.
I don't care how people write 'this is shit' to be fair...or insult the players, manager and owner exactly the same way over and over again, despite history and the events before your very eyes not supporting said criticism.
If, however, those are literally your ONLY opinions...repeated ad nauseum until reasonable argument becomes pointless and even the most charitable supporter of free speech and supplying clean drinking water to patrons feels obliged to finally tell you to **** off......I can see why the Guardians of the Gasroom condemned @Wanderers82 to Room 101.
If himself has done a Richie and is reborn as a 40 years a fan literary gentleman such as @Quartersman80 I don't mind unless the cycle starts again.
@TheDancingYak exactly right, I blocked him...but despite my poorly managed attempts at being the better man kept kept getting drawn into his web of spit-splattered negativity because of seeing his quotes when others responded.
No, the difference is we're not expecting high levels of lingo skills, but we want better than "your sht" type posts, that our banned friend was wont to write.
Ps did you used to post under another user name, you're a teacher right?
Comments
I cannot believe you are so naive as to think that the profile created shortly after you ousted Wanderers82 which seems so similar in tone right down to the same of/have error is anything other that the same person, so I conclude that you are turning a blind eye because you know that upholding freedom of speech comes at the cost of permitting imbeciles to speak but that it a far cheaper price to pay than the alternative which is the silencing of critical discourse by those who would put themselves and their causes above criticism.
I am greatly offended that i am being accused of being someone else , if if had any idea that this was the way that you treated new members of this forum I would not of joined , the person you are accusing me of being must of been rude/nasty for people to react this way , as I said previously I thought this was a forum where people could give their opinions freely and not a forum where everyone has to agree with everyone, if that was the case that would make for a boring forum , differene of options is what makes forums Interesting.
is there a way I can check Wanderers82 profile to see exactly why you are accusing me of bring him and to understand why some people are so adverse to him?
Maybe you have just been incredibly unfortunate to have signed up precisely when the last guy got banned.
Having created a user name so similar in format to him that the only thing more obvious would have been to call yourself wanderers83.
Hmmmm. I'm with Ed.
Ffs... everyone give it a rest, and give people a chance ! It's no wonder it ends up being the same 20 or 30 people posting and no one else ever bothers
Don't recall seeing an official yellow card being issued. Not sure his imbecilic posts warranted a straight red!
Guy Incognito was a different person to Homer!
Let everyone post...just use ignore and/or do not quote the (person who may possibly be an annoying) f***wit when you respond. Simple.
One person's f***wit is another's deep insightful wisdom though ...
okay maybe not.
You are right, of course, @Twizz I should have posted (person who may or may not be an annoying) f***wit (depending on your point of view)
DrCongo’s house DrCongo’s rules.
Having been a mod on other forums you can spend an inordinate amount of your freetime dealing with fuckwits for no reward that sometimes it becomes the only course of action. And it can become a thankless task balancing what’s right for the majority
also, fun fact , I blocked wanderers82 but everytime one of you lot quoted him it still somehow floated back into view. Thanks for that.
Eight thumbs up are forgivable provided we are all agreed that @Wanderers82 and @Quartersman80 are one and the same person (albeit he/she may have been getting a bit of help in composing recent posts). I too agree with @Ed_ ’s suggestion that, in the interests of free speech, the person formerly known as Wanderers82 should be allowed to continue to post under his/her new username.
You know it makes sense.
It feels snobby to mock someone based on their literacy. This forum is for football opinions - stop grading posts like it's an A-level English Language exam.
I'm not sure Wanderers82 was being criticised for not keeping up with Oxford entry level writing in fairness.
More for constant negative invective, horribly articulated.
Who’s mocking, @frequentstander ? I’m certainly not. I’m supporting the suggestion that allowing free speech is commendable.
Is this the realistic signings thread?
So have we signed the Polish keeper?
I'm not calling out anyone in particular! In the last two or three pages of posts you can observe a minimum of three different users either directly or indirectly mocking grammar/spelling/linguistic approach.
Apparently not. I came here just now to see if there was confirmation of the rumour that a goalkeeper had been signed. Nothing on the official website either.
"Horribly articulated" 😂 - not digging you out, but the irony of that post is very funny.
What’s wrong with “horribly articulated” @frequentstander ?
I don't care how people write 'this is shit' to be fair...or insult the players, manager and owner exactly the same way over and over again, despite history and the events before your very eyes not supporting said criticism.
If, however, those are literally your ONLY opinions...repeated ad nauseum until reasonable argument becomes pointless and even the most charitable supporter of free speech and supplying clean drinking water to patrons feels obliged to finally tell you to **** off......I can see why the Guardians of the Gasroom condemned @Wanderers82 to Room 101.
If himself has done a Richie and is reborn as a 40 years a fan literary gentleman such as @Quartersman80 I don't mind unless the cycle starts again.
@TheDancingYak exactly right, I blocked him...but despite my poorly managed attempts at being the better man kept kept getting drawn into his web of spit-splattered negativity because of seeing his quotes when others responded.
I realise this is my weakness.
No need to dig @Malone out. He has his own inimitable style. Love it.
The first sentence of the post suggests he wasn't being criticised for his writing.
The very next sentence suggests Quarters/Wanderers posts are 'horribly articulated'.
I'm not digging him out. He didn't mean it like that. The irony of the post was funny.
No, the difference is we're not expecting high levels of lingo skills, but we want better than "your sht" type posts, that our banned friend was wont to write.
Ps did you used to post under another user name, you're a teacher right?
By "he" do you mean "i?"
I didn't come down with the rain pal.
It is seriously the one thing that really winds me up on here more than anything else
However, we know the culprits @HolmerBlue despite their denials 😉.
I’ll reiterate, I don’t think they’re the same person. But even if they were, second chances should be allowed.