@ReadingMarginalista said:
I didn't mean that to be ambiguous! If my sources are correct, the spectres of boardrooms past that will be haunting us shortly are a bit older.
Ive heard the rumours of the imminent return of certain characters who were big wigs
before Mr Hayes.
I beleive there are 7 new candidates standing for the Trust, lets hope they are examined
thoroughly for stoogism linked to previous regimes.
Sorry to jump off the current topic and back to the thread topic, but just seen the goals on sky sports and how Plymouth got away with that second goal I'll never know. I saw Ingram complaining last night that he was being held when they scored from the corner and he was damn right. I think it's the number 9 who is basically leaning on Ingram to stop him from moving. He makes no attempt to jump for the ball at all. And I think that led to Pierre not going with his man and thus giving him a free header. I know you should always play to the whistle but it was such a blatant foul on Ingram it's untrue.
Obviously doesn't excuse the poor performance from the majority of the team (the exceptional Mawson excepted of course) but it doesn't help when teams get away with that right under the refs nose.
@Blue_since_1990 said:
For me our midfield is obviously very much weaker. We are really missing Josh and Paris and an in-form Peter Murphy. Add to that the fact that we are missing Hayes up front and it is clear we are now a very different outfit. There is not much we can do about the need to sell our best players to enable consolidation but it really would be a shame if we do not use the loan market to strengthen our small squad.
I am not knocking GA or his staff as they have done a great job but just pointing out the obvious really.
Yes that's very obvious - But we have to move on don't we. Josh was one of a kind.
We have to make the most of what we have, I think we are in a bit of an experimental period in Midfield trying players in different roles hence Wood and Bloomfield and adapting to Bean coming in. No Good moaning just have to make it work again.
@Fidget said:
Sorry to jump off the current topic and back to the thread topic, but just seen the goals on sky sports and how Plymouth got away with that second goal I'll never know. I saw Ingram complaining last night that he was being held when they scored from the corner and he was damn right.
You never know but if the ref had seen highlights of Ingram's Oscar-winning show at Cambridge (do refs do their homework on teams they are about to ref? maybe not), it might be a case of the boy who cried wolf, sadly. Or the ref just missed it, who can tell.
Comments
Ive heard the rumours of the imminent return of certain characters who were big wigs
before Mr Hayes.
I beleive there are 7 new candidates standing for the Trust, lets hope they are examined
thoroughly for stoogism linked to previous regimes.
So who are you talking about ReadingM?
You dont need to be Dick Tracy or Miss Marples for this conundrum ?
Before Hayes but not Brian Lee or the ghost of Jack Smethurst !!
And ChasHarps. Tell us who you think is returning and how?
Sorry to jump off the current topic and back to the thread topic, but just seen the goals on sky sports and how Plymouth got away with that second goal I'll never know. I saw Ingram complaining last night that he was being held when they scored from the corner and he was damn right. I think it's the number 9 who is basically leaning on Ingram to stop him from moving. He makes no attempt to jump for the ball at all. And I think that led to Pierre not going with his man and thus giving him a free header. I know you should always play to the whistle but it was such a blatant foul on Ingram it's untrue.
Obviously doesn't excuse the poor performance from the majority of the team (the exceptional Mawson excepted of course) but it doesn't help when teams get away with that right under the refs nose.
Yes that's very obvious - But we have to move on don't we. Josh was one of a kind.
We have to make the most of what we have, I think we are in a bit of an experimental period in Midfield trying players in different roles hence Wood and Bloomfield and adapting to Bean coming in. No Good moaning just have to make it work again.
You never know but if the ref had seen highlights of Ingram's Oscar-winning show at Cambridge (do refs do their homework on teams they are about to ref? maybe not), it might be a case of the boy who cried wolf, sadly. Or the ref just missed it, who can tell.
Best opposition player I've seen at AP (first half anyway) in many a year