Let's hope "really significant offer" isn't 500k upwards, as nothing suggests we're suddenly a club that lash those sort of fees out, however much our owner is worth.
Given his age and ceiling, I expect it would be 500k at the very least.
And I think if Evatt is openly admitting to have told us the asking price ahead of the window, it's pretty clear they want to sell.
What's his valuation do we think? 24 year old high performing midfielder with a fairly lengthy contract. I'd be surprised if they'd accept anything below 500-600k.
My worry is this means that we will likely spend the entirety of January with a Morley shaped hole whilst negotiations are ongoing, whilst we have a very important month fixture-wise. Big test for the owners.
I keep harking on about that mad run of 4 home games in about 8 days from Jan 1 on.
Just that week or so alone is a significant part of the season.
We can't just whop in with a huge bid though. And he surely can't just sit at Bolton absolutely ludicrously ignored by that oaf Evatt.
Plus he can't play for any other club for 6months.
What's his valuation do we think? 24 year old high performing midfielder with a fairly lengthy contract. I'd be surprised if they'd accept anything below 500-600k.
And I think if Evatt is openly admitting to have told us the asking price ahead of the window, it's pretty clear they want to sell.
Agreed. So what do we all think would be a fair price for a young talented midfielder who cost Bolton £150K from Rochdale (I think)? A player Bolton decided was surplus to requirements.
Agreed. So what do we all think would be a fair price for a young talented midfielder who cost Bolton £150K from Rochdale (I think)? A player Bolton decided was surplus to requirements.
Whether they've decided he's surplus to requirements is unfortunately fairly irrelevant. What is relevant is his form (superb) and his contract (till 2027).
I'd take that as a positive. By effectively saying Morley is for sale, they're also sending a rather negative message to the player. Assuming Morley wants to stay, I'd think there's room for negotiation. They'll want a good fee, but at the same time they won't want an unhappy player in the squad.
Agreed. So what do we all think would be a fair price for a young talented midfielder who cost Bolton £150K from Rochdale (I think)? A player Bolton decided was surplus to requirements.
I think the Bolton fan, @FarmerCee suggested about 300k?
They key here seems to be they want to sell and don't really want to play him. It's not like he's a critical part of their lineup, then the fee would surely be higher?
I also think Birmingham and, to a lesser extent, Wrexham have skewed the market at this level. Clubs will think they can hold out for more than they might have done before.
Well, that's just fucking brilliant isn't it? Not that I expected anything different, especially with someone as arrogant as Ian Evatt pulling the strings.
Imagine going 18 league games unbeaten and it ending at fucking Stevenage.
Well, that's just fucking brilliant isn't it? Not that expected anything different, especially with someone as arrogant as Ian Evatt pulling the strings.
Imagine going 18 league games unbeaten and it ending at fucking Stevenage.
Merry fucking Christmas.
Surely them being open to a sale is much better than Evatt saying he's coming back to be re-introduced into their squad?
Well, that's just fucking brilliant isn't it? Not that expected anything different, especially with someone as arrogant as Ian Evatt pulling the strings.
Imagine going 18 league games unbeaten and it ending at fucking Stevenage.
Merry fucking Christmas.
Morley will play the next two games surely? No reason this has to cause a poor performance at Stevenage.
Surely them being open to a sale is much better than Evatt saying he's coming back to be re-introduced into their squad?
Depends on the valuation doesn't it? I don't see us paying any fee over £300,000. To be honest, I don't see this deal being done at all, and then our season completely falls apart.
I am not blaming Evatt or Bolton. What are they going to say "Here, have our loan player to get you promoted instead of us"? I don't like Evatt, but we would expect to use our leverage if the situation was reversed.
Depends on the valuation doesn't it? I don't see us paying any fee over £300,000. To be honest, I don't see this deal being done, and then our season completely falls apart.
No player is irreplaceable, no matter how integral, and I back us more than ever to replace more than adequately - if we need to replace him at all. But really, if we're not willing to shell out for a player on whom we've got a huge, tangible sample size on which to base our decision on, when are we ever going to?
Depends on the valuation doesn't it? I don't see us paying any fee over £300,000. To be honest, I don't see this deal being done, and then our season completely falls apart.
It definitely can't be too much over that for sure. Though I think some fans have got carried away with the wealth of the owner and will expect a mad fee.
I am not blaming Evatt or Bolton. What are they going to say "Here, have our loan player to get you promoted instead of us"? I don't like Evatt, but we would expect to use our leverage if the situation was reversed.
We won't find any fee out anyway it'd be the classic "undisclosed". Although when we got to the championship it was notable how even with Gaz's secrecy stuff would leak out early.
I am not blaming Evatt or Bolton. What are they going to say "Here, have our loan player to get you promoted instead of us"? I don't like Evatt, but we would expect to use our leverage if the situation was reversed.
I don't think anyone blames Evatt or Bolton for looking after their "asset". It doesn't change the fact that he's an unbearable oaf.
No player is irreplaceable, no matter how integral, and I back us more than ever to replace more than adequately - if we need to replace him at all. But really, if we're not willing to shell out for a player on whom we've got a huge, tangible sample size on which to base our decision on, when are we ever going to?
You're going to be in for some real disappointment (as are we all).
This is an embed external element. It can be deleted using the delete key or the backspace key. To view the full element, press the preview button below.
Comments
Given his age and ceiling, I expect it would be 500k at the very least.
Lommy is now worth 5.8 Billion, so I assume they've added an extra zero to whatever they think the player is worth.
What's his valuation do we think? 24 year old high performing midfielder with a fairly lengthy contract. I'd be surprised if they'd accept anything below 500-600k.
I think it’s 58 - your age plus mine divided by two.
I keep harking on about that mad run of 4 home games in about 8 days from Jan 1 on.
Just that week or so alone is a significant part of the season.
We can't just whop in with a huge bid though. And he surely can't just sit at Bolton absolutely ludicrously ignored by that oaf Evatt.
Plus he can't play for any other club for 6months.
So there's a good chance something can happen.
750k to 1m I'd imagine. He really is that good.
Agreed. So what do we all think would be a fair price for a young talented midfielder who cost Bolton £150K from Rochdale (I think)? A player Bolton decided was surplus to requirements.
Whether they've decided he's surplus to requirements is unfortunately fairly irrelevant. What is relevant is his form (superb) and his contract (till 2027).
I'd take that as a positive. By effectively saying Morley is for sale, they're also sending a rather negative message to the player. Assuming Morley wants to stay, I'd think there's room for negotiation. They'll want a good fee, but at the same time they won't want an unhappy player in the squad.
Will be an interesting couple of weeks!
I think the Bolton fan, @FarmerCee suggested about 300k?
They key here seems to be they want to sell and don't really want to play him. It's not like he's a critical part of their lineup, then the fee would surely be higher?
I also think Birmingham and, to a lesser extent, Wrexham have skewed the market at this level. Clubs will think they can hold out for more than they might have done before.
Well, that's just fucking brilliant isn't it? Not that I expected anything different, especially with someone as arrogant as Ian Evatt pulling the strings.
Imagine going 18 league games unbeaten and it ending at fucking Stevenage.
Merry fucking Christmas.
Surely them being open to a sale is much better than Evatt saying he's coming back to be re-introduced into their squad?
Morley will play the next two games surely? No reason this has to cause a poor performance at Stevenage.
The general misery of having to set foot in Stevenage will see to that
Depends on the valuation doesn't it? I don't see us paying any fee over £300,000. To be honest, I don't see this deal being done at all, and then our season completely falls apart.
It can't get much worse than the Stryjek red card moment there last year...
I am not blaming Evatt or Bolton. What are they going to say "Here, have our loan player to get you promoted instead of us"? I don't like Evatt, but we would expect to use our leverage if the situation was reversed.
We will sign him.
Being an Orthodox country, Kazakhstan celebrates Christmas on January 7th.
Perfect day for Santa Lommy to give us a gift.
No player is irreplaceable, no matter how integral, and I back us more than ever to replace more than adequately - if we need to replace him at all. But really, if we're not willing to shell out for a player on whom we've got a huge, tangible sample size on which to base our decision on, when are we ever going to?
It definitely can't be too much over that for sure. Though I think some fans have got carried away with the wealth of the owner and will expect a mad fee.
Beat me to it
I hope Ian Evatt gets dysentery for Christmas.
We won't find any fee out anyway it'd be the classic "undisclosed". Although when we got to the championship it was notable how even with Gaz's secrecy stuff would leak out early.
Our Boxing Day record is bollocks (sans dogs).
I don't think anyone blames Evatt or Bolton for looking after their "asset". It doesn't change the fact that he's an unbearable oaf.
You're going to be in for some real disappointment (as are we all).
I will be if we don't sign Morley or replace him. That would be absurd and won't happen. We'll finish January with a stronger squad than we start it.
Bloody hell, cheer up. Your mood swings could rock the Titanic.