This means an extra £30k for the club with no disruption to either set of fans, hopefully providing some balance to those inconvenienced by the Tranmere game being switched.
This is disgraceful. Just after Christmas excesses AND the camera adds a good few pounds. When will football stop taking Sky money to make many in the crowd look fat even if they are wearing a slimming black overcoat?
@Wendoverman said:
This is disgraceful. Just after Christmas excesses AND the camera adds a good few pounds. When will football stop taking Sky money to make many in the crowd look fat even if they are wearing a slimming black overcoat?
Agreed. Couhig OUT (um, is he formally IN yet, or does there have to be some legal blah happen before he can be hounded OUT?)
On New Years Day, BT Sport are showing live all 10 Premier League games. The three at 3pm are Southampton v Spurs, Newcastle v Leicester and Watford v Wolves.
@Steve_Peart said:
On New Years Day, BT Sport are showing live all 10 Premier League games. The three at 3pm are Southampton v Spurs, Newcastle v Leicester and Watford v Wolves.
Close, but a mere 9. Liverpool for some reason afforded an extra day recovery before playing the day after.
@ValleyWanderer said:
You mean you didn't read the 50 page legal document? ????
It was only a draft version so, now the vote has been won, may in any case be subject to change before final completion and sale of shares. Hopefully it won't be changed in respect of any substantial points, but there won't be a re-vote, regardless of any revised terms.
I did vote in favour, but this was in the full realisation that my vote was based on what the Trust Board had communicated that the deal was likely to be; not on what the final deal actually will be, since they indicated that the agreement being presented for review was a draft and may be subject to change. I hope my trust in the Trust Board not to dilute any of the safeguards presented in the draft when agreeing and signing off on the final version is not misplaced.
@ValleyWanderer said:
You mean you didn't read the 50 page legal document? ????
Hilarious isn’t it?! The idea that any of the people who have quite correctly earned the right to vote on the future constitution of our club should actually want to read the legal terms of any such deal that hands it over into private ownership?! I’m crying here!
Comments
Moan moan, tv ruining football etc.
Oh wait...same day and time
This means an extra £30k for the club with no disruption to either set of fans, hopefully providing some balance to those inconvenienced by the Tranmere game being switched.
We're not great on it either, are we?
This is disgraceful. Just after Christmas excesses AND the camera adds a good few pounds. When will football stop taking Sky money to make many in the crowd look fat even if they are wearing a slimming black overcoat?
Agreed. Couhig OUT (um, is he formally IN yet, or does there have to be some legal blah happen before he can be hounded OUT?)
You mean you didn't read the 50 page legal document? ????
On New Years Day, BT Sport are showing live all 10 Premier League games. The three at 3pm are Southampton v Spurs, Newcastle v Leicester and Watford v Wolves.
Are there really ten PL games on NYD?
Close, but a mere 9. Liverpool for some reason afforded an extra day recovery before playing the day after.
You're right @Malone, I didn't read their flyer closely enough.
https://sport.bt.com/news/premier-league-bt-sport-to-broadcast-every-game-exclusively-live-on-new-years-day-S11364402800977
It was only a draft version so, now the vote has been won, may in any case be subject to change before final completion and sale of shares. Hopefully it won't be changed in respect of any substantial points, but there won't be a re-vote, regardless of any revised terms.
I did vote in favour, but this was in the full realisation that my vote was based on what the Trust Board had communicated that the deal was likely to be; not on what the final deal actually will be, since they indicated that the agreement being presented for review was a draft and may be subject to change. I hope my trust in the Trust Board not to dilute any of the safeguards presented in the draft when agreeing and signing off on the final version is not misplaced.
Hilarious isn’t it?! The idea that any of the people who have quite correctly earned the right to vote on the future constitution of our club should actually want to read the legal terms of any such deal that hands it over into private ownership?! I’m crying here!
It could have been written in Swahili for all my understanding of legal jargon!
Yes @EwanHoosaami, I was just making a (I thought) humerous retort to @PBo' post. No offence to legal document readers intended!