Trust Nominations
I have studied the Trust nominations a number of times & to this end one of the canditates submission is written in the 3rd party. This worries me a great deal. Not only that, but it contains a number of name droppings. I may be wrong but I suspect that the other canditates will have met far more influential people without name dropping.
As an aside I am still on a high having driven to Sunderland & back on Saturday. The Sunderland fans, stewards & Police were so friendly & helpful. The downside was the return Park & Ride where it took 40 minutes to board a bus. As soon as my daughter & I got on the bus a number of others turned up. Perhaps the powers that be thought Wycombe were going to time waste until 5.30pm! Still worth it though!
0
Comments
Use of “third person” should be limited to staff appraisals, novels, biographies etc where an outsider is describing a person’s views, qualities and achievements. When the person described uses third person in reference to him/herself I think it is known as Kevin Nolan Syndrome. Not particularly endearing.
Has to be said it is a weird pitch (I picked up on the third party and the very long name dropping of people and programmes too - none of which seems overly relevant)that must make Mr Massie currently the outsider of the five for four places. I believe there are hustings though, so plenty of time to pull it round.
Must back Mr Massie?!
Why must you back Mr Massie, Micra?
(OK yes, typo now corrected to "make)
Not sure that third parties are involved.