@Twizz I am being a muppet don't worry. Having read a few articles about the issue its only for penaltys to avoid a triple punishment. Yes it appears Mr Salisbury had little ground not to send off their chap. You learn something new every day.
If only Mr Salisbury would also admit he made a mistake.
His only defence, I feel, could be that in his opinion it was not an obvious goal scoring opportunity. In which case, I would suggest, reviews the video ...........
Comments
@Twizz I am being a muppet don't worry. Having read a few articles about the issue its only for penaltys to avoid a triple punishment. Yes it appears Mr Salisbury had little ground not to send off their chap. You learn something new every day.
@leo030500. FA Law 12 2016-2017 Well this is my source http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
I'd say these are the new rules unless you can quote differently? Perhaps the FA issued some kind of guidance notes?
Please understand I'm not trying to be argumentative here, just seeking clarification on behalf of the gasroom.
@leo030500 nothing personal but you've not helped your brethren's cause there!!
Yes I'm aware of that @bookertease, I may have to hibernate for a few weeks now ahah mugged myself right off.
@leo030500 - are you Salisbury in disguise?
If only Mr Salisbury would also admit he made a mistake.
His only defence, I feel, could be that in his opinion it was not an obvious goal scoring opportunity. In which case, I would suggest, reviews the video ...........
Any foul against Scott Kashket within 18 yards of the goal should be treated as preventing a clear cut goal scoring opportunity.