Best Of

That makes me think that we are soon going to hear opposition supporters singing ‘where were you when you were s - - t’.

The bit that I find totally perplexing is that AAH2 is linked with Stoke, Baggies and other top half budgeted sides. Kone is linked with clubs toward the bottom. Kone has a much better track record and is certainly a much better player in my book.

He might just be bidding for a striker that he knows well and who will improve his present team and knows Dan Rice doesn't really like Richard above and beyond photo-ops trying to show his great connection with the team.

Perhaps we'll never know.

Why?

Whether there is a clause or not, it is our decision whether to accept a bid or not.

Even if a clause existed, they could still suggest a price and if attractive we could waive the clause.

If there was a contractural break clause as suggested, not in our power to insert new clauses anyway.

But I don’t think there were many suitors for Stansfield. There is loads of interest in Kone.

Bloomfield doesn't care about Wycombe anymore. Why would he?

Some fans should adopt the same perspective and move on rather than attacking ownership with no substance.

FWIW, I don't think we should entertain bids of less than £5m - double that for Luton.

They can have him for £10m+ their new stadium as a prefab and Mick Harford lol

Yes

What does £5 million do for us at this point of the season that the league's top scorer (ignoring a player no longer in the league) doesn't? Considering the finances that we have behind us now, I think rejecting bids of that size for Kone is a risk we should take.

Luton have had a bid rejected for Kone per Pete O'Rourke