Best Of

The fact there seems to be a fairly 5050 split on it on the gasroom suggests it wasn't a cut and dried decision.

But it's clear those ones tend to go the way of the big home crowd.

Low was escllebet, as were all the back 3 in the second half. Reach very good too. I'd be minded to stick with that going forward - our wide attacking players just don't offer enough.

Much better second half and looked really good with three at the back. I wonder if Dodds may go with this going forward.

The 3 OWWSA coachloads of supporters each voted independently & all 3 voted for Joe Low.

Escllebet indeed

It is, but you generally need to be a better player to succeed there.

As I said in my original post: bollocks

Here is the law:

• Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned
• Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off

This was not excessive force, it was just a mistimed tackle, albeit reckless in nature. And this is why I think there is a strong case for appealing.

It's a good theory, although I put it alongside the money laundering conspiracy TBH.

Having said that, as far as I can see, their signing makes absolutely no sense so far. So maybe ...

🤷‍♂️

Simons red card was for serious foul play, it was red all day long...

SERIOUS FOUL PLAY

A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.

Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play.