I can only imagine Leahy at RB? Or Harvie switches? Or we are playing an unbalanced 3-4-3 formation where we will try and keep the ball on the left of the pitch?
Given each side’s absentees and unknowns, this game will either finish 0-0 or 4-4.
I also wonder about the online attendances. I heard third-hand a season or two ago that for one Tuesday game (I think against Fleetwood) the attendance was given as around 4k when there were actually only 2.5k rattling around in the ground.
After all the grief we’ve had from other fans about Low potentially leaving, it’s rather hilarious that Huddersfield are missing Helik with a ‘knock’ before a move to Coventry
Comments
In more (hopefully) positive news Helik is missing for Huddersfield
And we all know bishops are celibate. A clever way to get up the pecking order!
I can only imagine Leahy at RB? Or Harvie switches? Or we are playing an unbalanced 3-4-3 formation where we will try and keep the ball on the left of the pitch?
Okay, I made up the last one.
As a father of twins, he has my
deepest sympathieshuge congratulations.But down the pecker order
thinking the same.....
Let's win to spare Shamal any more night Terriers.
Hmm, surprised Skura isn’t at right back. He’d be very good.
Must be Harvie to RB and Leahy to LB.
Anything else is bonkers. I really hope it’s not Scowen at RB and Leahy in midfield.
It looks like we're matching up with Huddersfield Town's 3-5-2 formation.
LOW - BRADLEY - LEAHY
FRED - SCOWEN - BAKINSON - HUMPHREYS - HARVIE
UDOH - KONE
My brain is boggling..... guess we will have to watch this space
Oh.... and massive congratulations 🎊 to Shamal George!!
Yeah not sure how the rest of the gasroom made a pig sty of it. Almost certainly this
Given each side’s absentees and unknowns, this game will either finish 0-0 or 4-4.
I also wonder about the online attendances. I heard third-hand a season or two ago that for one Tuesday game (I think against Fleetwood) the attendance was given as around 4k when there were actually only 2.5k rattling around in the ground.
You could well be right, just seems an odd time to move back to three at the back. Particularly with Leahy and Bradley not being the quickest.
Leahy to right back and the others fall in to place.
That's what I'm assuming too. 3 at the back seems like the wild outlier guess to me.
Ironic that JMac had no hope of a start behind and Grimmer and Pattenden, and now he might have been straight into the team.
Yup, not a fan of the idea of Leahy in a back 3 at all, I’m going with the Leahy LB and Harvie RB theory
Attendance called at 6.13?
Even if it's 12 of us...we're here to witness the game of the season.
Possibly
After all the grief we’ve had from other fans about Low potentially leaving, it’s rather hilarious that Huddersfield are missing Helik with a ‘knock’ before a move to Coventry
Euphemism for Coventry knocking on their door with a fat check, no doubt.
This would be my punt at guessing our formation
Leahy at RB
Didn’t Harvie fill in at RB on his debut for the club? I’m guessing Leahy LB and Harvie RB…
Defenders we've lost since mid December
Taylor (loan ended)
JMac (released)
Pattenden (injured)
Hartridge (suspended)
Grimmer(?)
Taff (ill/injured) - he was out anyway
No wonder we suddenly added Bradley yesterday.
If he plays as well at right back as he does on the left we’ll be fine.
Commentator seems to know his stuff so far, but you don't need to say 'birth of baby twins'. Being born implies they're babies. Pedantic, sure
Don't worry, I picked up on that too lol
Bradley putting his stamp on proceedings from the start.
It is a back 3 then