Best Of
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
I don't think these things are related. The model the club is adopting is that players are bought regardless of managers. It's the manager that is selected to play to a certain style and get the best out of players purchased over his head.
You could tell from the nudge-nudge-wink-wink interviews Blooms gave through December he was keen to bring in Morley, yet instead a few Scandi lads are brought in. Nothing wrong with that, but as MB hadn't met the first before he signed, it's clear they weren't bought with him in mind.
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
What counter offer could Wycombe make? Once a club at a higher level, offering a substantially better package, and what on the face of it more closely matches the roll wanted, realistically it can't be matched. Accept the situation and move on. If the offer is right, you don't stand in the way of players wishing to step up, why should it be different for anyone else.
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
For such a big business brain, I'm surprised you don't know what constructive dismissal is.
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
Fundamentally, no matter how much Dan Rice may have respected Matt's tactical nous and ability to get great results, he was well within his rights to want to move to a head coach / director of football model where Matt would lose access to part of his existing role. The model Dan wants to move to is less dependent on us having a strong manager and allows the role to be split better so that whoever is head coach gets to spend more time on the training pitch and less in the negotiating room. This doesn't seem insensible to me.
Yes you can argue that Dan should have given up on that model in order to keep Matt at the club and happy. But even if he'd signed a long contract it wouldn't have really stopped him moving to another club if one had come calling with an offer of Championship football. And then Dan would have to build a whole new system, possibly mid season. Viable, sure, but he's perfectly within his rights to want to build it from the get go and replace Matt with a head coach if and when he chose to move on.
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
Gonna be a hypocrite and post again on the subject. Do we know they didn't value him? Perhaps he was offered a new contract and turned it down with his sights set on bigger things (like Luton, who people need to get over their hatred towards and accept are a considerably bigger club with a decent chance of getting to the Prem in the next couple of years).
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
Nail on the head, seems dumb to not change your mind once person is performing above and beyond
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
A lot more professional than it could have been. I mean, that’s been the case since they came in so I have to assume the rift started from day one.
Weird how they sanctioned all those signings during that period.
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
It's very difficult to watch that and hold back the tears.
Re: Matt Bloomfield to Luton?
Yes, because refusing to say "the manager's" name in interviews was very grown up.