Best Of

Are there any instances where "we" don't have to embrace the change? Possibly some examples from history where it might've been better if "we" hadn't?

Sorry for having a conversation with a person that said they actually liked the post and appreciated the discussion.

whats that about trying to police what other people post?

It never ceases to amaze me how people's perception of a post is so different. Other than the typo of employer instead of employee, I thought @TheAndyGrahamFanClub's recent post was concise and to the point and yet you consider it was a "waffling diatribe".

Hopefully come Saturday evening we will all have a more enjoyable matter to debate!

Having @our_frank pushing up behind me for a playoff place is also uncomfortable.

Wycombe 3 Rovers 1 would/should/could keep him at bay.

Perfect post!

Hear hear to that. I somehow forced myself to read the latest waffling diatribe from @TheAndyGrahamFanClub after initially wondering what strange ramification had led him to describe MB as a loyal employer.

The circumstances leading to the parting of ways may not be officially documented but it surely doesn’t require incessant repetition on here for anyone with half a brain to understand how it was destined to happen.

I look back with sadness now to the time - three or four months ago - when I was still naive enough to suggest on here that it was imperative for the new owners to offer MB a contract extension that he wouldn’t be able to refuse. I was also naive enough, as weeks and months went by, to wonder why such an offer was not forthcoming.

The sadness of realisation and the subsequent tears when the inevitable happened will dog me for life.

But we really do have to put all that behind us and hope that Mike Dodds will succeed in restoring what I used to refer to as Premier League style (if not quite quality!) football.

Having only a two point gap at the top of the table is very stressful.

One of my colleagues ( a complete neutral) went to the game as he lives near Crawley. It was interesting to get his view. He was impressed by Udoh troubling their centre backs, Scowen was 'a terrier', he thought Fred was completely anonymous and Low was a bit dirty and was lucky to stay on the field. The bloke that came on looked quality...I assume he means Simons.

I said it was unlucky he did not get to see Kone in action.

In hindsight, that was a terrible question. I need to switch my brain on

If they did anything like that I think I would beat you to posting ‘What the f..k???’